Skip to content
Anthropic v. DoW

Issue

Bill of Attainder (Koh et al.)

Doctrinal framework

U.S. Const. art. I, §§ 9 cl. 3 and 10 cl. 1.

Modern attainder test (Selective Service System v. Minnesota PIRG, 468 U.S. 841 (1984); Nixon v. Administrator, 433 U.S. 425 (1977)) requires (1) specificity — singles out an identifiable person; and (2) punishment without judicial process.

Status after the PI

Not pleaded by Anthropic, but raised by Koh, Swartz, Gupta, and Worthington on Just Security (Mar. 6, 2026). Available as a potential amendment.

Open questions

Whether Anthropic adds a Bill of Attainder count on amendment, and how the modern attainder doctrine — rarely applied to corporate entities — would map to the facts.

Sources & authority

  1. 1.CommentaryThe Anthropic Designation and the Bill of Attainder Doctrine (Just Security, Mar. 6, 2026)
  2. 2.AuthoritySelective Service System v. Minnesota PIRG · 468 U.S. 841 (1984)
  3. 3.AuthorityNixon v. Administrator · 433 U.S. 425 (1977)

← All issues